Securities Antitrust Consumer Fraud Structured Finance Whistleblower/Qui Tam Corporate Governance Mergers & Acquisitions ERISA Healthcare Fraud
PartnersOf Counsel Associates Staff Attorneys All
M & A Investigations New Federal Securities Cases Current CasesSettlements & Class Notices Accolades
Our Institutional Monitoring Service Our ProcessReporting Custom Monitoring
Articles Press Releases Television
Contact Us Join a Class Action Report a Fraud

Articles

What If The Government Says A False Claim Isn't False?

By Mark Strauss, Kirby McInerney LLP
Law360, New York (November 28, 2016) -- The anti-fraud bar is focused on the upcoming oral argument in the appeal of the trial verdict in United States et rel. Harman v. Trinity Industries Inc., calendared for Dece. 7, 2016, before the Fifth Circuit. The $663 million verdict -- the largest in the history of the federal False Claims Act -- raises questions going to the heart of the FCA's qui tam (whistleblower) provisions.

Those provisions enable private parties who have evidence of fraud against the government to bring civil lawsuits for the recovery of damages on the government's behalf. Successful qui tam whistleblowers receive bounties of 15 and 30 percent of what the government receives.

This article can be accessed in its entirety by clicking on the link to the right under Accompanying Documents.



Attorneys

Mark A. Strauss


Kirby McInerney LLP | 825 Third Avenue | NYC 10022 | Tel. 212.371.6600 | Fax 212.751.2540

Attorney Advertising - Prior Results do not Guarantee a Similar Outcome




Law Firm Web Design by Business Edge