Securities Antitrust Consumer Fraud Structured Finance Whistleblower/Qui Tam Corporate Governance Mergers & Acquisitions ERISA Healthcare Fraud
PartnersOf Counsel Associates Staff Attorneys All
M & A Investigations New Federal Securities Cases Current CasesSettlements & Class Notices Accolades
Our Institutional Monitoring Service Our ProcessReporting Custom Monitoring
Articles Press Releases Television
Contact Us Join a Class Action Report a Fraud

New Federal Securities Cases

Elan Corporation

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors who purchased American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) of Elan Corporation, plc (Elan) (NYSE: ELN) or call options thereon, or who sold put options on Elan ADRs during the period from July 21, 2008 through and including 4:00 pm EDT on July 29, 2008 (the Class Period).

The lawsuit alleges that S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P. (SAC Capital) and related parties, including its founder and chief executive officer, Steven Cohen, engaged in illegal insider trading in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by selling Elan ADRs and trading options ahead of adverse clinical trial results for an Alzheimer’s disease drug that was central to Elan’s drug development efforts.

As alleged in the lawsuit, a portfolio manager at SAC Capital, Mathew Martoma, obtained inside information from the medical doctor who chaired the drug’s safety monitoring committee, Sidney Gilman. The complaint further alleges that after obtaining the clinical trial results from Gilman, Martoma spoke with Cohen, and over the following seven trading days, SAC Capital then liquidated its entire holding of Elan ADRs, worth over $350 million, and acquired a short position in Elan amounting to approximately 4.5 million ADRs.

When the results of the clinical trial were publicly disclosed after hours on July 29, 2008, Elan’s ADRs dropped sharply in value, closing the next day down 41.8% from the 4:00 pm closing price on July 29, 2008, prior to the public disclosure. According to the complaint, by liquidating its long position and selling short in advance of the disclosure of the disappointing clinical trial results, SAC Capital avoided losses and obtained gains of at least $220 million on its investments in Elan.

Martoma is presently the subject of a criminal prosecution for his alleged role in the insider trading of Elan securities. Gilman has settled civil charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission arising out of his conduct, agreed to pay more than $200,000 in disgorgement, and has entered into a nonprosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s office.

If you acquired Elan ADRs during the Class Period, you may, no later than February 19, request that the Court appoint you lead plaintiff of the class. Although your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff, lead plaintiffs make important decisions that could affect the overall recovery for class members, including decisions concerning settlement.

If you wish to discuss this action, or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact us.


Ira M. Press

Kirby McInerney LLP | 825 Third Avenue | NYC 10022 | Tel. 212.371.6600 | Fax 212.751.2540

Attorney Advertising - Prior Results do not Guarantee a Similar Outcome

Law Firm Website Design by Business Edge