Luminar Technologies, Inc.

Case Overview
52 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 09/22/2025 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: Luminar Technologies, Inc. |
Court: | Court: Middle District of Florida |
Case Number: | Case Number: 6:25cv01384 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 03/20/2025 - 05/14/2025 |
Ticker: | Ticker: LAZR |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida on behalf of those who acquired Luminar Technologies, Inc. (“Luminar Technologies” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:LAZRI) securities during the period of March 20, 2025 through May 14, 2025, inclusive (“the Class Period”). Investors have until September 22, 2025 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
On May 14, 2025, approximately 30 minutes after Luminar issued its first quarter 2025 financial results, the Company issued a press release announcing that Russell had resigned, "effective immediately, following a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics inquiry by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors." On the following day, investment analysts at J.P. Morgan issued a report downgrading Luminar stock. The report stated, among other things, Russell's "leadership in technology and his industry reputation were central to the bull thesis for the company." On this news, Luminar's stock price fell $0.80 per share, or 16.80%, to close at $3.96 per share on May 15, 2025.
The complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's compliance, operations, and outlook. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Austin Russell ("Russell"), Luminar's President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board, was engaged in undisclosed conduct that would make him the subject of an inquiry by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors; (2) this conduct created material risk that Russell would be released from his positions at the Company; (3) Luminar's loss of Russell as an employee would then create material risk of adversely affecting the Company's business by making it more difficult to, compete with other market participants, manage R&D activities, and retain existing customers or cultivate new ones. Further, negative public perception and negative news related to Russell could also adversely affect Luminar's brand, relationships with customers, or standing in the industry; and (4) accordingly, Luminar had no reasonable basis to provide and/or maintain the Company's financial guidance.
On May 14, 2025, approximately 30 minutes after Luminar issued its first quarter 2025 financial results, the Company issued a press release announcing that Russell had resigned, "effective immediately, following a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics inquiry by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors." On the following day, investment analysts at J.P. Morgan issued a report downgrading Luminar stock. The report stated, among other things, Russell's "leadership in technology and his industry reputation were central to the bull thesis for the company." On this news, Luminar's stock price fell $0.80 per share, or 16.80%, to close at $3.96 per share on May 15, 2025.
The complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's compliance, operations, and outlook. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Austin Russell ("Russell"), Luminar's President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board, was engaged in undisclosed conduct that would make him the subject of an inquiry by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors; (2) this conduct created material risk that Russell would be released from his positions at the Company; (3) Luminar's loss of Russell as an employee would then create material risk of adversely affecting the Company's business by making it more difficult to, compete with other market participants, manage R&D activities, and retain existing customers or cultivate new ones. Further, negative public perception and negative news related to Russell could also adversely affect Luminar's brand, relationships with customers, or standing in the industry; and (4) accordingly, Luminar had no reasonable basis to provide and/or maintain the Company's financial guidance.