Tronox Holdings PLC

Case Overview
56 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 11/03/2025 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: Tronox Holdings PLC |
Court: | Court: District of Connecticut |
Case Number: | Case Number: 3:25cv01441 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 02/12/2025 - 07/30/2025 |
Ticker: | Ticker: TROX |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of those who acquired Tronox Holdings PLC (“Tronox” or the “Company”) (NYSE:TROX) securities during the period of February 12, 2025 through July 30, 2025, inclusive (“the Class Period”). Investors have until November 3, 2025 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
As a result of the setback in sales, defendants revised the Company’s 2025 financial outlook lowering its full-year revenue guidance and reducing its dividend by 60%. Following this news, Tronox’s common stock declined dramatically. From a closing market price of $5.14 per share on July 30, 2025, Tronox’s stock price fell to $3.19 per share on July 31, 2025, a decline of about 38% in the span of just a single day.
According to the complaint, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Tronox’s ability to forecast the demand for its pigment and zircon products or otherwise the true state of its commercial division, despite making lofty long-term projections, Tronox’s forecasting processes fell short as sales continued to decline and costs increased, ultimately, derailing the Company’s revenue projections. On July 30, 2025, Tronox announced its financial results for the second quarter of fiscal 2025, revealing a significant reduction in TiO2 sales for the quarter. The Company attributed the decline to “softer than anticipated coatings season and heightened competitive dynamics.”