Fiserv, Inc.

Case Overview
59 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 09/22/2025 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: Fiserv, Inc. |
Court: | Court: Southern District of New York |
Case Number: | Case Number: 1:25cv06094 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 07/24/2024 - 07/22/2025 |
Ticker: | Ticker: FI |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of those who acquired Fiserv, Inc. (“Fiserv” or the “Company”) (NYSE:FI) securities during the period of July 24, 2024 through July 22, 2025, inclusive (“the Class Period”). Investors have until September 22, 2025 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
On April 24, 2025, Fiserv reported Clover GPV growth of only 8% for the first quarter of 2025, a stepdown from 2024 GPV rates of between 14% and 17%. The Company attributed this slowing growth to lower 2025 transaction volumes from Payeezy merchants who had converted to Clover. On this news, Fiserv stock declined by approximately 18.5%, closing at $176.90 per share on April 24, 2025.
Then, on May 15, 2025, Fiserv disappointed investors by disclosing that GPV growth deceleration would continue throughout 2025. On this news, Fiserv stock declined by approximately 16.2%, closing at $159.13 per share on May 15, 2025.
Finally, on July 23, 2025, Fiserv lowered the top end of its full-year organic growth guidance range and confirmed that its quarterly organic revenue in the Merchant segment had decelerated to 9% year-over-year from 11% in the previous quarter. On this news, Fiserv stock declined by approximately 13.9 percent, closing at $143.00 per share on July 23, 2025.
The lawsuit alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Fiserv misled investors by failing to disclose that: (a) due to cost issues and other problems with its older Payeezy platform, Fiserv forced Payeezy merchants to migrate to its Clover platform; (b) Clover's revenue growth and gross payment volume ("GPV"), the total monetary value of transactions processed through Clover, were temporarily and unsustainably boosted by these forced conversions, which concealed a slowdown in new merchant business; (c) shortly after these conversions, a significant portion of former Payeezy merchants switched to competing solutions due to Clover's high pricing, significant down time, and systematic compatibility issues; and (d) as a result of these merchant losses, Clover's GPV growth was significantly slowing, and its revenue growth was unsustainable.
On April 24, 2025, Fiserv reported Clover GPV growth of only 8% for the first quarter of 2025, a stepdown from 2024 GPV rates of between 14% and 17%. The Company attributed this slowing growth to lower 2025 transaction volumes from Payeezy merchants who had converted to Clover. On this news, Fiserv stock declined by approximately 18.5%, closing at $176.90 per share on April 24, 2025.
Then, on May 15, 2025, Fiserv disappointed investors by disclosing that GPV growth deceleration would continue throughout 2025. On this news, Fiserv stock declined by approximately 16.2%, closing at $159.13 per share on May 15, 2025.
Finally, on July 23, 2025, Fiserv lowered the top end of its full-year organic growth guidance range and confirmed that its quarterly organic revenue in the Merchant segment had decelerated to 9% year-over-year from 11% in the previous quarter. On this news, Fiserv stock declined by approximately 13.9 percent, closing at $143.00 per share on July 23, 2025.
The lawsuit alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Fiserv misled investors by failing to disclose that: (a) due to cost issues and other problems with its older Payeezy platform, Fiserv forced Payeezy merchants to migrate to its Clover platform; (b) Clover's revenue growth and gross payment volume ("GPV"), the total monetary value of transactions processed through Clover, were temporarily and unsustainably boosted by these forced conversions, which concealed a slowdown in new merchant business; (c) shortly after these conversions, a significant portion of former Payeezy merchants switched to competing solutions due to Clover's high pricing, significant down time, and systematic compatibility issues; and (d) as a result of these merchant losses, Clover's GPV growth was significantly slowing, and its revenue growth was unsustainable.